I hold a theory that some percentage of folks are addictable. There are no doubt some substances that overcome our ability to control ourselves, and addict nearly everyone that experiences it, like crack, but that's not what I'm talking about. Rather, that in the normal course of events they will find a target for that addiction sensitivity, become addicted, and live their life striving to normalize around it. If they adhere to a bad one, they may try to replace it with a good one, trade alcohol for running, cocaine with the adrenaline of "the deal".
Is it true? Is it a nature vs. nuture thing? Does the percentage vary by gene subset? Are there genetic subsets which have culturally self selected over time for non-addictability? Is there a bell curve for addicts? Would we want to know? Would it be politically correct to use such information in policy?
No comments:
Post a Comment